[Postgres-xl-developers] Database object handling

Pavan Deolasee pavan.deolasee at gmail.com
Tue Sep 12 01:31:32 PDT 2017


On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> I think we should just standardise handling of various objects. At the
> very least, we should create all permanent objects on all nodes (including
> views/matviews/tables/sequences). In fact, it seems to me that we should
> be able to even create temporary objects on all nodes, given that they are
> created in a backend-local schema and hence should not conflict with other
> objects with the same name, created via other coordinator. But at this
> point, I am ok to keep the temp objects just on the local coordinator. It
> could help us cut down some unnecessary traffic between coordinators. But
> IMV we should do it consistently for all object kinds.
>
>
I've now committed a fix along these lines.

Thanks,
Pavan

-- 
 Pavan Deolasee                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.postgres-xl.org/private.cgi/postgres-xl-developers-postgres-xl.org/attachments/20170912/5a088a0d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Postgres-xl-developers mailing list