[Postgres-xl-developers] Making GTM optional

Atri Sharma atri.jiit at gmail.com
Tue Aug 12 10:04:22 PDT 2014


I will be glad to participate in this.

Do we have any wiki for this yet? Is there any discussion that has already
happened around this?

Regards,

Atri


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Mason Sharp <msharp at translattice.com>
wrote:

> Hi Atri,
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was wondering if its possible and how hard is it it make GTM starting
>> optional. I  understand that it may lead to consistency issues but if we
>> ensure eventual consistency on each node and with coordinator (maybe), we
>> could avoid the overhead of GTM.
>>
>> Deploying an instance of Postgres-XL for test at work raised this
>> question,if we do heavy analytics, we may want to tradeoff consistency with
>> performance, so I was wondering if its possible and how we can go about it.
>>
>>
> Actually, this is something we have been discussing, more so recently.  If
> just doing inserts and queries, one could use a simpler architecture if you
> understand the trade-offs. We also need to handle other issues, like
> sequences, but that is doable.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Atri
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Atri
>> *l'apprenant*
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Postgres-xl-developers mailing list
>> Postgres-xl-developers at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xl-developers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mason Sharp
>
> TransLattice - http://www.translattice.com
> Distributed and Clustered Database Solutions
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Atri
*l'apprenant*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.postgres-xl.org/private.cgi/postgres-xl-developers-postgres-xl.org/attachments/20140812/a6b2b5d2/attachment.htm>


More information about the Postgres-xl-developers mailing list